Tag: CV and Resume

Find practical advice on creating effective CVs and resumes that clearly communicate skills, experience, and value.

Finding Your True Worth – How to Figure Out the Right Salary

Figuring out the right salary for your role can be tricky. Everyone seems to have an opinion, but how do you know what’s real?

1. Opinions/Social Media or Forums (Least Reliable)

People love to talk about salaries on social media and in casual conversations. Remember that opinions are often Trojan horses for hidden agendas. People often have their own reasons for saying what they do. Sometimes, people are motivated to post false numbers to influence opinions and set certain expectations in the job market. Also, they might exaggerate to look good and impress others in public while downplaying their earnings when talking to coworkers. It’s hard to know what’s true.

2. Surveys (Better, But Not Perfect)

More structured than opinions. Helps to collect more information, including the demographics of the participants so you can analyse them better. But since the answers are self-reported, this information can contain biases and false information.

3. Research (The Best Method)

The most reliable understanding of salaries often comes through proper research. A mix of different sources including informal conversations, online surveys, and platforms like Glassdoor. In some cases, information gathered directly from companies adds valuable perspective. When data is collected from multiple angles and cross-checked, the result tends to be a more accurate and balanced view.

Not all sources hold equal weight. Information from trusted or direct sources usually carries more value than unverified hearsay. In practice, combining many sources while being mindful of their reliability often brings researchers closer to the actual market range.

Finally: Salary details are usually considered confidential in most workplaces, which makes finding accurate numbers challenging. No single source can provide the full picture. It seems that a layered, evidence-based approach is the closest thing to a scientific method when trying to understand compensation standards.

Two Types of CVs – Which One Do You Have?

When applying for jobs, your CV is crucial in getting noticed and securing an interview. In a previous post, I discussed how simply enhancing a CV isn’t the only factor affecting your job search. However, this doesn’t mean we should neglect optimizing our CVs before applying.

Personally, when reviewing or helping someone enhance their CV, I notice two main types of optimization.

CVs Optimized for Shortlisting

First, there are CVs optimized for shortlisting. These CVs are designed to pass applicant tracking systems (ATS) and capture recruiters’ attention. They include relevant keywords from the job description, a clean, structured format, and highlights of your skills and achievements. The goal is to get past initial filters and increase your chances of an interview.

CVs Optimized for Truthfulness

Second, there are CVs optimized for truthfulness. These CVs focus on accuracy and honesty. Instead of manipulating content to match job descriptions, they reflect your real skills and experience, avoid exaggeration or buzzwords, and provide a clear, authentic view of your career. This builds realistic expectations and fosters trust with potential employers.

Which type is better? That’s the question I keep pondering. I’ve noticed most people try to make their CVs pass computer filters and catch a recruiter’s eye. Personally, I believe prioritizing truthfulness is most important, something often lacking in today’s job market. When everyone’s worried about keywords and how their CV looks to computers. I’m wondering if we’ve lost sight of the value of genuine representation in our professional narratives. It’s a thought I wanted to share and explore.

This is my personal opinion. I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments!

Polishing Your CV, is Really a Solution?

I run ITPro.lk, a platform that processes IT job applications daily. A frequently asked question is: “I am applying for jobs, but I am not getting a good response. Can you review my CV and tell me how I can improve it?”. From what I’ve seen, most CVs are well-written and don’t need major improvements. The internet is already flooded with CV guides, YouTube Gurus, templates, and services, which has helped to raise this standard.

The real challenge today is discovering the truth about candidates and the companies/roles they apply for. Both sides often present polished, unrealistic versions of themselves online, creating a trust gap in the employer-candidate relationship.

This reminds me of how relationships worked before the internet and social media. Back then, connections were deeper and more genuine. Today, the initial contact is easy and cheap. Despite better communication tools, the quality of relationships has declined today. The same is happening between employers and candidates.

Focusing too much on perfecting CVs to solve employment issues is like blaming your horoscope for relationship problems. It misses the real issues of authenticity and trust.

Discovering Your Ideal Career Path: A Breakdown of the Self-Assessment Survey

Living in a world full of choices and opportunities, we are often influenced by others when making decisions. But are we truly making the right choices when it comes to important matters? I wanted to create a self-assessment survey to help people figure out the ideal career path tailored to them. This is specifically designed for individuals looking to make a choice in the IT field.

For the initial version, I’ve kept it ultra-simple. The survey consists of just four multiple-choice questions. If you’d like to try it out, here’s the link: https://itpro.lk/mypath

Logic Rules to Map to Career Pathways

The first question gathers input about the user’s preferred tasks, while the remaining three validate the initial choice. Based on their answers, the survey suggests career paths best aligned with their preferences.

Recommending Software Development:

  1. Task: A (Building software).
  2. Skills: Intermediate/Advanced programming.
  3. Motivation: High earning potential, Opportunities for creativity.
  4. People/Tasks: Prefers technical tasks.

Recommending Data Science/Analysis:

  1. Task: B (Analyzing data).
  2. Skills: Intermediate/Advanced programming.
  3. Motivation: High earning potential, Job stability and security.
  4. People/Tasks: Prefers technical tasks.

Recommending UI/UX Design:

  1. Task: C (Designing visuals).
  2. Skills: Beginner/Intermediate programming.
  3. Motivation: Opportunities for creativity.
  4. People/Tasks: Prefers technical tasks.

Recommending Cybersecurity:

  1. Task: D (Solving security challenges).
  2. Skills: Intermediate/Advanced programming.
  3. Motivation: High earning potential, Job stability and security.
  4. People/Tasks: Prefers technical tasks.

Recommending Quality Assurance:

  1. Task: E (Testing and improving quality).
  2. Skills: Beginner/Intermediate programming.
  3. Motivation: Job stability and security.
  4. People/Tasks: Prefers technical tasks.

Recommending IT Academic:

  1. Task: F (Teaching IT concepts).
  2. Skills: Beginner/Intermediate programming.
  3. Motivation: Helping others, Leading and organizing teams.
  4. People/Tasks: Enjoys working with people.

Recommending IT Management (Project/Product):

  1. Task: G (Managing teams and projects).
  2. Skills: Beginner/Intermediate programming.
  3. Motivation: Leading and organizing teams.
  4. People/Tasks: Enjoys working with people.

Recommending to try different paths

If the answers provided by users don’t align with any of the options, the system suggests exploring different paths to discover the most suitable career for them.

That’s all for now, folks! 🙂 I know it’s a very basic tool, and its recommendations shouldn’t be taken too seriously. I just recommend giving it a try for fun. I’m working on a more advanced version to share with you in the future.